4.3 Article

Essentials of neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship: scholarship perspective

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 528-533

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-00957-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01DK118568]
  2. St. Louis Children's Hospital Foundation
  3. Children's Discovery Institute of Washington University
  4. St. Louis Children's Hospital
  5. Department of Pediatrics at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows are required to achieve scholarly accomplishment in training, but there is a small number of MD-only physician-scientists pursuing research-oriented careers. Factors contributing to the decline in physician-scientists in neonatology include low pay, inadequate research training, and perceptions of poor work-life balance. Improvements in funding and mentorship are needed to foster interest in physician-scientist careers and prevent further declines.
Neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows must achieve a meaningful accomplishment in scholarly activity as part of their training. Despite the requirement for scholarly training in fellowship, there is a vanishingly small number of MD-only physician-scientists pursuing a research-oriented career. Recent neonatal trainees have identified several factors that preclude their careers in research-focused academic neonatology, including lower pay in academic positions, inadequate training in research techniques, and the perception that individuals in research careers have a poor work-life balance. High competition for limited pediatric research funds also contributes to a diminishing pool of physician-scientists in neonatology. This small number of physician-scientists is threatened by a high rate of attrition among physicians who enter this career path. In order to prevent further declines in the number of neonatal physician-scientists, we need improvements in funding and strong intra- and cross-institutional mentorship to foster individuals interested in a career as a physician-scientist.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据