4.1 Article

Adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Guidelines for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials Related to Mandibular Third Molars

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 79, 期 6, 页码 1207-1213

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.01.032

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RCTs related to mandibular third molars do not fully adhere to the CONSORT checklist, highlighting the need for editorial policies, peer reviewers, and researchers to endorse the use of CONSORT for transparent reporting.
Purpose: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the backbone of evidence-based medicine. Despite the widespread acceptance of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), its use for reporting clinical trials in journals remains poor. The purpose of this study was to find out to what extent RCTs related to mandibular third molars have adhered to the CONSORT statement. Methods: This study was carried out during April 2020 to June 2020. PubMed was used to retrieve RCTs related to mandibular third molars conducted during the last 5 years. The search terms used were mandibular third molar OR lower third molar OR impacted mandibular third molar AND randomized controlled trial. Each article was assessed for adherence to the CONSORT statement. Results: Eighty unique articles were retrieved. The mean percentage adherence to the CONSORT statement noted was 60.26%. Of the 37 CONSORT items, only 4 items showed 100% adherence (2a, 2b, 4a, and 12a). The most underreported itemswere #10, 12b, 17a, 17b, 18, 19, 23 to 25. Of the 23 journals considered, 6 journals did not recommendCONSORT for reporting RCT in the Instructions to Authors'' guidelines. Conclusions: Within the limits of the study, it is clear that the RCTs related to third molar do not show 100% adherence to the CONSORT checklist. The editorial policy, peer reviewers, and researchers should endorse the use of the CONSORT checklist for transparent reporting of the RCTs. (C) 2021 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据