4.7 Article

In-situ FTIR study of reaction mechanism and chemical kinetics of a Xundian lignite during non-isothermal low temperature pyrolysis

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 180-188

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.019

关键词

Lignite; Coal pyrolysis; Functional groups; In-situ FTIR; Kinetics of pyrolysis

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB238903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41373110, 21306181]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Investigating the real time changes of functional groups during lignite pyrolysis can deepen understanding of reaction mechanism of lignite under oxygen-free condition, and help upgrading its quality and enhancing the conversion efficiency. In this study, non-isothermal low temperature pyrolysis of lignite using in-situ Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was carried out to investigate the evolution of six most abundant functional groups in lignite. The evolution of these functional groups was divided into several stages with different mechanisms and kinetic characteristics. The decomposition of C-O associated with hydroxyls by hydrogen bonds (HBs) played an important role in the pyrolysis process below 400 degrees C. The activation energies for the pyrolysis of lignite at various stages were mostly lower than 70 kJ/mol, and demonstrated the important role of HBs in the low temperature pyrolysis. Additionally, the HBs were mainly related to the aromatic phenol, aromatic ether and phenoxy for C-O, and quinone and carboxyl for C=O. At higher temperature stage (above 300 degrees C), the oxygen contained functional groups, including carboxyl, carbonyl and especially ether, began to decompose, resulting in greater loss of coal materials. At the temperature up to 400 degrees C, the C-C bonds began to break apart, which caused the primary decomposition of aliphatic groups and the increasing intensity of aromatic C-H. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据