4.5 Article

An improved nonlinear innovation-based parameter identification algorithm for ship models

期刊

JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 549-557

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0373463321000102

关键词

ship model; parameter identification; nonlinear innovation; stochastic gradient

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51679024, 51909018]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University of China [3132016315]
  3. University 111 Project of China [B08046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a nonlinear innovation parameter identification algorithm for ship models, which has been verified to have effectiveness and accuracy through experimental simulations. The improved algorithm enhances parameter identification accuracy by about 12% compared to the traditional least squares algorithm, demonstrating practicality and extendibility.
To solve the problem of identifying ship model parameters quickly and accurately with the least test data, this paper proposes a nonlinear innovation parameter identification algorithm for ship models. This is based on a nonlinear arc tangent function that can process innovations on the basis of an original stochastic gradient algorithm. A simulation was carried out on the ship Yu Peng using 26 sets of test data to compare the parameter identification capability of a least square algorithm, the original stochastic gradient algorithm and the improved stochastic gradient algorithm. The results indicate that the improved algorithm enhances the accuracy of the parameter identification by about 12% when compared with the least squares algorithm. The effectiveness of the algorithm was further verified by a simulation of the ship Yu Kun. The results confirm the algorithm's capacity to rapidly produce highly accurate parameter identification on the basis of relatively small datasets. The approach can be extended to other parameter identification systems where only a small amount of test data is available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据