4.4 Article

Simultaneous UHPLC/MS quantitative analysis and comparison of Saposhnikoviae radix constituents in cultivated, wild and commercial products

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL MEDICINES
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 499-519

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11418-021-01486-1

关键词

Saposhnikoviae radix; Saposhnikovia divaricata; UHPLC/MS; Furanocoumarin; Peucedanum ledebourielloides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that there is no significant difference in the components of Saposhnikoviae radix from different regions in China, with the main components being prim-O-glucosylcimifugin and others. Additionally, root thickness and drying temperature during cultivation can affect component content, and with prolonged cultivation, the content gradually approaches that of wild products.
Differences in the components of the crude drug Saposhnikoviae radix, both wild and cultivated, and the cultivation duration were examined by UHPLC/MS. As a result, there was no significant difference in composition depending on the region in China where the drug was produced. The most abundant components in all samples were prim-O-glucosylcimifugin, 4 '-O-glucosyl-5-O-methylvisamminol, 3 '-O-acetylhamaudol and cimifugin. The 1 year-old Saposhnikoviae radix cultivated in Japan had a low component content overall. A comparison of components according to root thickness revealed that glycosides, such as prim-O-glucosylcimifugin and 4'-O-glucosyl-5-O-methylvisamminol, were accumulated in thin roots. In a comparison of the components according to the drying temperature, a large difference was observed in the content of glycosides, and a difference was observed depending on the sugar-binding position. According to a metabolome analysis in domestic commercial products by LC/MS, a characteristic component in the cultivated product was found and its content was low in the 1 year-old sample and high in the 2 year-old sample. If the cultivation duration is prolonged up to about 6 years, the contents of the ingredients are close to those of wild products. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据