4.7 Article

Rigid crosslinkers towards constructing highly-efficient ion transport channels in anion exchange membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 619, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118806

关键词

Anion exchange membrane; Rigid crosslinker; Crosslinked membrane; Ion transport channels; H-2/O-2 fuel cell

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21676220, 21878253, 21736009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a strategy to improve the performance of synthetic AEMs by using rigid crosslinkers, which can enhance the water uptake and ionic conductivity while reducing the swelling ratio. Rigid crosslinkers are shown to be beneficial for constructing efficient ion channels and overcoming the trade-off relation between ionic conductivity and dimensional stability in AEMs.
Synthetic anion exchange membranes (AEMs) usually suffer from low conductivity, bad alkaline stability and poor dimensional stability. Constructing efficient ion transport channels is considered to be one of the most effective ways for preparing the AEMs with the high conductivity and low swelling ratio. Herein we demonstrate a facile strategy to achieve this goal via using the rigid crosslinkers to expend the interchain spacing of polymer chains. Three crosslinkers are chose to modify poly (ether ketone) (PEK) AEMs. The AEMs with rigid crosslinkers have more efficient ion transport channels and thus show both higher water uptake and higher ionic conductivity, compared with the AEM with the flexible crosslinker. Especially, the hydroxide conductivity of the AEM increases from 63.2 to 110.3 mS cm(-1) at 80 degrees C when the short flexible crosslinker is replaced by the long rigid crosslinker. Meanwhile, the swelling ratios (SR) are less than 25%. The rigid crosslinkers should be beneficial to construct efficient ion channel and overcome the trade-off relation between the ionic conductivity and dimensional stability of the synthetic AEMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据