4.7 Article

FLT3 Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Challenges and Recent Developments in Overcoming Resistance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 2878-2900

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01851

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [SBK2016020485, BK20180573]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81502925]
  3. China Pharmaceutical University [CPU2018GF02]
  4. College Students Innovation Project for the R&D of Novel Drugs from the National Found for Fostering Talents of Basic Science (NFFTBS) [J1310032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the FLT3 gene are common in newly diagnosed AML patients, and FLT3 inhibitors show positive effects in AML treatment but resistance develops quickly. Strategies to overcome resistance include developing new small-molecule FLT3 inhibitors, combining FLT3 inhibitors with other therapies, and developing multitarget inhibitors.
Mutations in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene are often present in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with an incidence rate of approximately 30%. Recently, many FLT3 inhibitors have been developed and exhibit positive preclinical and clinical effects against AML. However, patients develop resistance soon after undergoing FLT3 inhibitor treatment, resulting in short durable responses and poor clinical effects. This review will discuss the main mechanisms of resistance to clinical FLT3 inhibitors and summarize the emerging strategies that are utilized to overcome drug resistance. Basically, medicinal chemistry efforts to develop new small-molecule FLT3 inhibitors offer a direct solution to this problem. Other potential strategies include the combination of FLT3 inhibitors with other therapies and the development of multitarget inhibitors. It is hoped that this review will provide inspiring insights into the discovery of new AML therapies that can eventually overcome the resistance to current FLT3 inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据