4.7 Review

SARS-CoV-2 infection affects the lower urinary tract and male genital system: A systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 93, 期 5, 页码 3133-3142

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26883

关键词

coronavirus; disease control; COVID-19; infection; genital tract; SARS-CoV-2; urinary tract

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review identified studies on the involvement of urinary and male genital systems in COVID-19. The findings include various urinary symptoms, bladder hemorrhage, acute urinary retention, as well as male genital symptoms such as scrotal discomfort, swelling, and pain. Additionally, it reported a significant reduction in sperm quality among patients with moderate COVID-19.
PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases were searched to identify studies published up to December 2020 on the involvement of urinary and male genital systems in COVID-19. Sixteen studies involving a total of 575 patients (538 males and 37 females) were included in this systematic review. The COVID-19 phase was available for 479 patients: 426 in the acute and 53 in the recovery phase. De novo lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were observed in 43 patients and deterioration of pre-existing LUTS in 7. Bladder hemorrhage was observed in three patients and acute urinary retention in one. Regarding the male genital system, scrotal discomfort was observed in 8 patients, swelling in 14, pain in 16, and erythema in 1; low flow priapism was observed in 2 patients. Ultrasound examination identified acute orchitis in 10 patients, acute epididymitis in 7, and acute epididymo-orchitis in 16. A case-control study reported that patients with moderate COVID-19 show a significant reduction in sperm concertation, the total number of sperms per ejaculate, progressive motility, and complete motility. In contrast to what is known from the first studies on the subject, this review also includes subsequent studies that give evidence of the involvement of the lower urinary tract and male genital system in COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据