4.7 Article

Cheese whey valorisation: Production of valuable gaseous and liquid chemicals from lactose by aqueous phase reforming

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 453-469

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.044

关键词

Cheese whey; Lactose; Aqueous phase reforming; Renewable hydrogen; Value-added liquids

资金

  1. Aragon Government (GPT group)
  2. European Social Fund
  3. Spanish MINECO [ENE2010-18985, ENE2013-41523-R, BES- 2011-044856]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cheese effluent management has become an important issue owing to its high biochemical oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand values. Given this scenario, this work addresses the valorisation of lactose (the largest organic constituent of this waste) by aqueous phase reforming, analysing the influence of the most important operating variables (temperature, pressure, lactose concentration and mass of catalyst/lactose mass flow rate ratio) as well as optimising the process for the production of either gaseous or liquid value-added chemicals. The carbon converted into gas, liquid and solid products varied as follows: 5-41%, 33-97% and 0-59%, respectively. The gas phase was made up of a mixture of H-2 (8-58 vol.%), CO2 (33-85 vol.%), CO (0-15 vol.%) and CH4 (0-14 vol.%). The liquid phase consisted of a mixture of aldehydes: 0-11%, carboxylic acids: 0-22%, monohydric alcohols: 0-23%, polyhydric-alcohols: 0-48%, C3-ketones: 4-100%, C4-ketones: 0-18%, cyclic-ketones: 0-15% and furans: 0-85%. H-2 production is favoured at high pressure, elevated temperature, employing a high amount of catalyst and a concentrated lactose solution. Liquid production is preferential using diluted lactose solutions. At high pressure, the production of C3-ketones is preferential using a high temperature and a low amount of catalyst, while a medium temperature and a high amount of catalyst favours the production of furans. The production of alcohols is preferential using medium temperature and pressure and a low amount of catalyst. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据