4.5 Article

Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE) prediction models for ignition sensitive fuels using machine learning methods

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104343

关键词

Minimum ignition energy (MIE); Quantitative structure-property relationship; (QSPR); Machine learning

资金

  1. Eli Lilly and Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully developed QSPR regression models for predicting MIE of 60 flammable compounds using machine learning algorithms and a non-machine learning algorithm. The results showed that the ANN model is more reliable for MIE prediction of small datasets with lower machine learning bias due to the addition of an extra parameter.
Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) regression models for Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE) prediction of 60 flammable compounds have been developed using machine learning algorithms Random Forests (RF), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and a non-machine learning algorithm Genetic Function Approximation (GFA). RF algorithm was implemented for feature selection to identify the 13 molecular descriptors having maximum effect on MIE prediction accuracy (i.e. descriptors affecting MIE prediction accuracy > 1%). Thereafter, these descriptors were used as input parameters to develop the RF, ANN and GFA models. The optimized RF algorithm resulted in test set R2 of 0.85 and displayed high internal robustness and external predictability. The ANN and GFA algorithms displayed improved performance only on addition of an additional parameter Structure Parameter to the existing 13 descriptor set. The optimized ANN and the GFA models displayed a test set R2 of 0.79 and 0.71, respectively. The ANN model resulted in lower machine learning bias as compared to the RF model. The ANN model was observed to be more reliable than RF model for MIE prediction of small datasets. Based on this work, the RF algorithm for feature selection in QSPR modeling and the ANN, RF algorithms were observed to be promising options for MIE prediction applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据