4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Robust Imaging-Free Object Recognition Through Anderson Localizing Optical Fiber

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 920-926

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2020.3029416

关键词

Optical fibers; Optical fiber networks; Object recognition; Speckle; Optical fiber testing; Robustness; Machine learning; Microstructured optical fiber; deep learning; object recognition; transverse Anderson localization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes the stability of optical fiber output images for object recognition, achieving high classification accuracy even when the fiber is bent or positioned far away from the object.
Recognizing objects directly from optical fiber output images is useful in endoscopic applications when forming a clear image of the object is unnecessary or rather difficult. Conventional fiber-optic systems, such as multicore-fiber-based and multimode-fiber-based systems, suffer from the sensitivity of the fiber to external perturbations. For example, a slight movement of the fiber (a-few-millimeters translation of the tip for meter-long multicore fibers or multimode fibers) can greatly change the output images of the system. In this work, we utilize the light guidance stability of recently proposed glass-air Anderson localizing optical fiber (GALOF) to achieve robust imaging-free objection recognition. We transport five classes of cell images through an 80-cm straight GALOF. A deep convolutional neural network is trained to classify the output images and tested on images never seen, namely, images collected when the fiber is bent or when the fiber facet is placed several millimeters away from the object without any distal optics. Bending-invariant high classification accuracy (86.8% on average) is observed all the way to the maximum bending offset distance of 45 cm (similar to 74thinsp;degrees bending angle). High classification accuracy (91.2%) is also preserved when the fiber facet is 0.5 mm away from the object.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据