4.7 Article

A comprehensive evaluation of GPM-IMERG V06 and MRMS with hourly ground-based precipitation observations across Canada

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 594, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125929

关键词

IMERG V06; MRMS; QPE evaluation; Canada; Precipitation; Remotely sensed data

资金

  1. NSERC ENGAGE grant
  2. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction (ICLR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the performance of multiple high-resolution remotely sensed precipitation estimates over Canada, with PrecipitationCal performing best in the Prairies but still having room for improvement in intense precipitation events.
This study investigates the performance of multiple high-resolution remotely sensed precipitation estimates at hourly and daily time scales over Canada for 2014-2018. Four products of the recently released Integrated Multi-satEllite Retrievals for Global precipitation measurement (IMERG-V06) and the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) Precipitation Rate data are analyzed for different seasons. Evaluations are based on a suite of metrics to assess different characteristics of precipitation estimates using quality-controlled hourly gauge data considered as the truth. The results suggest that Calibrated precipitation (PrecipitationCal) outperforms the other IMERG products particularly over the Prairies and during fall and summer. Over the western and eastern coastal regions, IMERG tends to overestimate precipitation intensities by similar to 25%. The discrepancy between satellite and ground-based data is higher for more intense precipitation events. Further analyses indicate that while MRMS tends to overestimate the amount of precipitation, it outperforms the IMERG products based on several metrics, especially in detecting the occurrence of precipitation over the eastern coastal regions. Overall, the study of IMERG V06 and MRMS precipitation estimates at a relatively high temporal resolution indicates that both products have the potential to complement ground-based observations over Canada.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据