4.7 Article

Dynamic and 3-D spatial variations in manure characteristics in two commercial manure-belt laying hen houses

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 403, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123581

关键词

Manure sampling; Manure total solids; Manure pH; Poultry house; Total ammonia nitrogen

资金

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project, USA [1011562]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0500505]
  3. Jiangsu Overseas Visiting Scholar Program for University Prominent Young & Middle-aged Teachers and Presidents, China
  4. Agricultural Air Research Council
  5. American Egg Board

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the characteristics of chicken manure vary significantly in time and space, correlated with indoor temperature and ventilation rate, and showed seasonal patterns. The variations in NH3 were greater than TS and pH. It was observed that chicken manure on the belts could lose approximately 2.5% moisture and 0.2% NH3 concentration per day.
Animal manure could be hazardous to human and animals if not managed properly. Laying hen manure in two commercial manure-belt houses was sampled in seven events over two years. A total of 124 samples was taken in randomly-selected 3-D space with 24 subspaces, composed of 3 sections x 4 sides x 2 floors in the houses. The samples were analyzed for manure pH, total solids (TS), and total ammonia (NH3). Manure characteristics demonstrated large temporal variations that were correlated with indoor temperature and ventilation rate and demonstrated quasi seasonal patterns. Variations in manure NH3 were larger than TS and pH. Manure characteristics varied substantially in the 3-D space but no patterns could be seen among the four sides and between the two floors. However, manure with different ages in the 3 sections along the manure belt moving direction showed differences in manure TS and NH3. Manure on the belts could loss approximately 2.5 % moisture and 0.2 % NH3 concentration per day.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据