4.5 Article

Settlement Rate Increase in Organic Soils Following Cyclic Loading

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002432

关键词

Secondary compression; Settlements; Embankment; Levee; Organic soil; Peat

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1208170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Postshaking settlements of model levees on soft compressible peat during centrifuge tests were compared with numerical solutions, showing that secondary compression is the main contributor to levee settlement and cyclic straining increases secondary compression rate.
Postshaking settlements observed during centrifuge tests of model levees resting atop soft compressible peat are compared with numerical settlement solutions. Two large-scale (9 m) tests and one small-scale (1 m) test are analyzed. The models included extensive instrumentation consisting of pore pressure sensors, accelerometers, bender elements, and displacement transducers to measure levee response during and after the application of scaled ground motions at the container base. Postcyclic settlement records suggested an increase in settlement rates within peat on cyclic loading compared with preseismic settlements due to the combined effects of excess pore pressure generation and secondary compression. The observed settlements were compared with the predictions of a one-dimensional nonlinear consolidation code that follows an implicit finite difference formulation. The code includes nonlinear compressibility and permeability properties and models secondary compression strain rate as a function of soil state rather than of time. Secondary compression was found to be the largest contributor to levee settlement. Further, cyclic straining was found to increase the secondary compression rate after earthquake shaking. Incorporating secondary compression reset into settlement predictions resulted in close agreement with measurements, whereas failing to consider secondary compression reset resulted in substantial underprediction of experimental settlement records. (c) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据