4.5 Article

The N3=3 → N3=4 enhancement of super Chern-Simons theories in D=3, Calabi HyperKahler metrics and M2-branes on the l (N0,1,0) conifold

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOMETRY AND PHYSICS
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.103962

关键词

Gauge theories; Supersymmetry; HyperKhler quotient; Chern-Simons theories; HyperKhler geometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates matter coupled supersymmetric Chern-Simons theories in three dimensions, extending the Gaiotto-Witten mechanism from flat HyperKahler manifolds to curved ones, and deriving precise conditions for supersymmetry enhancement. An infinite class of HyperKahler metrics compatible with the enhancement condition is provided by Calabi metrics on (CPn)-CP*, with specific examples leading to unique homogeneous Sasaki-Einstein 7-manifolds in the context of M-theory compactification.
Considering matter coupled supersymmetric Chern-Simons theories in three dimensions we extend the Gaiotto-Witten mechanism of supersymmetry enhancement N-3 = 3 -> N-3 = 4 from the case where the hypermultiplets span a flat HyperKahler manifold to that where they live on a curved one. We derive the precise conditions of this enhancement in terms of generalized Gaiotto-Witten identities to be satisfied by the tri-holomorphic moment maps. An infinite class of HyperKahler metrics compatible with the enhancement condition is provided by the Calabi metrics on (TPn)-P-star. In this list we find, for n = 2 the resolution of the metric cone on N-0,N-1,N-0 which is the unique homogeneous Sasaki-Einstein 7-manifold leading to an N-4 = 3 compactification of M-theory. This leads to challenging perspectives for the discovery of new relations between the enhancement mechanism in D = 3, the geometry of M2-brane solutions and also for the dual description of super Chern-Simons theories on curved HyperKahler manifolds in terms of gauged fixed supergroup Chern-Simons theories. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据