4.4 Article

Evaluation of PMA-qPCR methodology to detect and quantify viable Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef burgers

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.15338

关键词

-

资金

  1. MINCYT [PICT-2015-0291]
  2. National Institute of Agriculture Technology (INTA) [2019-PE-E7-I147-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that PMA-qPCR can detect and quantify viable STEC cells in beef burgers, even in the presence of a high concentration of non-viable cells. This methodology can help assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial treatments in reducing STEC contamination in meat products.
Propidium monoazide (PMA) is a selective nucleic acid intercalating dye that can be combined with real-time PCR (qPCR) in order to evaluate cell viability in food samples. The aim of the present work was to evaluate PMA-qPCR to detect and quantify viable STEC cells in beef burgers using stx(2) as target gene. First, it was determined that 100 mu M of PMA could inhibit qPCR signal from non-viable cells and had no influence on the amplification of different concentrations of viable cells. Then, it was shown that PMA efficiently distinguished between different log cfu of viable cells in presence of a high concentration of non-viable cells, both in culture and in beef burger homogenates. Finally, it was determined that PMA could distinguish between viable and non-viable cells within the same log cfu in beef burger homogenates. PMA-qPCR effectively detected and quantified viable STEC cells in culture and in beef burger homogenates. Novelty impact statement The main achievement of this work is that we demonstrate PMA-qPCR could not only detect, but also quantify viable STEC cells targeting stx2 gene, even in the presence of a high concentration of non-viable STEC cells in a complex matrix as beef burgers. This methodology can be used to assess effectiveness of antimicrobial treatments to reduce STEC contamination in meat products more rapidly and with less pathogenic residues than conventional methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据