4.7 Article

In-situ rheological and structural characterization of milk foams in a commercial foaming device

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110150

关键词

Milk foam; Foam theology; Bubble size distribution; In-situ rheometer geometry; Yield stress gradients

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presented an experimental setup for in-situ characterization of physical parameters of food foams, showing reliable determination of yield stress, gas volume fraction, and bubble size distribution at different heights. It was found that the gas volume fraction and bubble size increase monotonically during free drainage, and gradients of structural and rheological parameters along the direction of gravity increase over time. The yield stresses in milk foams were as predicted from phenomenological modeling, emphasizing the reliability of the measurement setup.
Processing, stability and sensorial perception of food foams are tightly related to their microstructure and flow behavior. Characterization of corresponding physical parameters is central for product development and quality control. An experimental setup enabling in-situ characterization of yield stress, gas volume fraction and bubble size distribution at different heights within a foam column created in a commercial whipping device is presented. Reliable determination of these quantities is shown. Foams made from regular and reconstituted milk have been investigated. Gas volume fraction and bubble size increase monotonically during free drainage. Related to the changes in these parameters, the yield stress increases strongly during initial drainage and weaker in mature foams. Gradients of the structural and rheological parameters along the direction of gravity increase over time. Yield stresses in these milk foams are as predicted from phenomenological modelling including the above parameters, emphasizing the reliability of the measurement setup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据