4.7 Article

Encapsulation and release of vitamin C in double W/O/W emulsions followed by complex coacervation in gelatin-sodium caseinate system

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 292, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110353

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [451-03-68/2020-14/200134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microcapsules for simultaneous encapsulation of hydrophilic and lipophilic active substances were produced and characterized using a double emulsification process followed by complex coacervation. The results indicated that genipin concentration and interaction in the gelatin/NaCAS system influence the properties of microcapsules. Release kinetic determination showed that the release mechanism is simple diffusion, with optimal genipin concentration and proteins mass ratio identified for highest encapsulation efficiency.
The objective of this study was to produce and characterize microcapsules for simultaneous encapsulation hydrophilic and lipophilic active substances. For this purpose, double emulsification process was employed, followed by complex coacervation in the system of two oppositely charged biopolymers, gelatin and sodium caseinate (NaCAS). Properties of the micmcapsules wall have been regulated by cross-linking of the gelatin/NaCAS complex at the interface with genipin. Vitamins C and E were selected as model hydrophilic and lipophilic bioactive compounds for this study. Investigations of surface morphology, encapsulation efficiency (EE) and kinetic of vitamin C release have shown that genipin concentration as well as interaction in gelatin/NaCAS system make an influence on microcapsules properties. Genipin concentration of 2 mmol/g, was chosen as the optimal and the highest EE of the vitamins were obtained at proteins mass ratio of 2:1. The results of release kinetic determination of the vitamins showed that release mechanism is simple diffusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据