4.7 Article

The barrier to radial oxygen loss impedes the apoplastic entry of iron into the roots of Urochloa humidicola

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 72, 期 8, 页码 3279-3293

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erab043

关键词

Apoplastic barriers; cellular ion distribution; root anatomy; suberin; tropical forage grasses; waterlogging; X-ray microanalysis

资金

  1. COLCIENCIAS (Colombian government)
  2. University of Western Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicates that establishing a barrier to ROL can effectively prevent Fe from entering the roots, thereby enhancing the plant's tolerance to waterlogging. The exclusion of Fe at the exodermis with a strong barrier to ROL, while K uptake remains unaffected.
Lack of O-2 and high concentrations of iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) commonly occur in waterlogged soils. The development of a barrier to impede radial O-2 loss (ROL) is a key trait improving internal O-2 transport and waterlogging tolerance in plants. We evaluated the ability of the barrier to ROL to impede the entry of excess Fe into the roots of the waterlogging-tolerant grass Urochloa humidicola. Plants were grown in aerated or stagnant deoxygenated nutrient solution with 5 mu M or 900 mu M Fe. Quantitative X-ray microanalysis was used to determine cell-specific Fe concentrations at two positions behind the root apex in relation to ROL and the formation of apoplastic barriers. At a mature zone of the root, Fe was 'excluded' at the exodermis where a suberized lamella was evident, a feature also associated with a strong barrier to ROL. In contrast, the potassium (K) concentration was similar in all root cells, indicating that K uptake was not affected by apoplastic barriers. The hypothesis that the formation of a tight barrier to ROL impedes the apoplastic entry of toxic concentrations of Fe into the mature zones of roots was supported by the significantly higher accumulation of Fe on the outer side of the exodermis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据