4.7 Article

Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and biomass production in four riparian plants grown in subsurface flow constructed wetlands for urban wastewater treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111806

关键词

Macrophytes; Macro-elements; Phytoremediation; Biomass collecting; Constructed wetland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that Arundo donax has a higher growth rate and biomass production during the vegetation period, showing better retention of nitrogen and phosphorus, especially in tertiary treatment.
Riparian woodlands play a multiple ecological and environmental role, including control of non-point source pollution and increasing of nutrients retention. Four riparian species (Arundo donax L., Salix purpurea L., Populus euphratica Olivier and Tamarix gallica L.) were tested comparatively in tertiary treatment and/or secondary one under a Mediterranean climate. Mesocosm inlets and outlets have been sampled every two weeks, during 21 successive months, and analyzed to determine nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contents. Growth, biomass production and/or NP contents of macrophytes were monitored during three successive vegetation periods. Results show that A. donax presents a higher growth rate (2.39 cm d(-1)) during the vegetation period, and a large harvestable biomass (118-134 t dry weight.ha(-1).y(-1)) and aboveground N/P accumulation (1.55-2.13 t N.ha(-1). y(-1)/0.16-0.17 t P.ha(-1).y(-1)). S. purpurea and T. gallica show medium performances in this respect. In addition, A. donax-Mesocosm retains more particulate and dissolved forms of total nitrogen and total phosphorus, and orthophosphates in both treatment levels. In tertiary treatment, the annual collecting of aboveground biomass contributes to the export of 31.4% N-14.1% P and 14.5% N-7.71% P removed, by A. donax and T. gallica mesocosms in the same order. Collecting biomass of riparian plant grown in subsurface flow constructed wetland promotes more N retention when compared to the P one.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据