4.7 Review

A step closer to circular bioeconomy for citrus peel waste: A review of yields and technologies for sustainable management of essential oils

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111832

关键词

Essential oil; Limonene; Food waste; Circular economy; Green chemistry

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 project DECISIVE (Decentralised valorization of biowaste), Aarhus University's Centre for Circular Bioeconomy [689229]
  2. Cambioscop project by French National Research Agency, Programme Investissement d'Avenir [ANR-17-MGPA-0006]
  3. Region Occitanie [18015981]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study critically reviews the essential oil extraction from citrus peel wastes, emphasizing the importance of harmonized data and eco-efficient methods. Evaluation of extraction technologies shows that water-based extraction and solvent-free microwave extraction are suitable for liquid fermentation processes. Direct use in fermentation of cold press extraction and solvent extraction methods have some limitations.
This study presents a critical overview of reported essential oil (EO) extractions from citrus peel wastes (CPW), including harmonized data on the various citrus species and cultivars. Harmonization is vital to enable sustainable management practices. The review only includes eco-efficient extraction techniques. In total, the review contains 66 quantified examples using i) mechanical cold press ii) thermal extraction with water or steam media iii) thermal microwave-assisted extraction iv) other innovative methods (such as ultrasound). The technologies were assessed for their potential use in cascading production to achieve economies of scope, particularly considering the use of extraction residues for subsequent fermentation to produce various products from energy carriers to enzymes. Two techniques were found insufficient for direct use in fermentation. Cold press extracts an inadequate amount of EO (average yield 2.85% DW) to ensure suitable fermentation, while solvent extraction contaminates the residues for its subsequent use. Extractions using water media, such as hydrodistillation and microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (average EO yield 2.87% DW), are feasible for the liquid-based fermentation processes, such as submerged fermentation. Steam extraction is feasible for any type of fermentation. Our review highlighted solvent-free microwave extraction (average EO yield 5.29% DW) as the most effective method, which provides a high yield in a short extraction time. We also uncovered and discussed several inconsistencies in existing yields and energy consumption published data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据