4.4 Article

Nitrogen and carbon incorporation in GaNxAs1-x grown in a showerhead MOVPE reactor

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 557, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125998

关键词

Impurities; Metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy; Nitrides; Semiconducting ternary compounds; Semiconducting III-V materials

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. Capes
  3. Finep
  4. Faperj
  5. company AZUR Space Solar Power GmbH
  6. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy through the project MatProZell [50RN1501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growth of dilute nitrides with metal organic chemical vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) faces challenges of low N-incorporation and high impurity levels of carbon and hydrogen. Investigation into N and C-incorporation in GaNxAs1-x showed that N-incorporation is proportional to the N/As ratio, while C primarily comes from group-III-methyl groups.
The growth of dilute nitrides with metal organic chemical vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) presents two major challenges: a low N-incorporation combined with a high impurity density of carbon and hydrogen. For the device implementation the full understanding of the growth of the metastable material and the influence of the parameters on the impurity levels is of high interest. We investigated the Nand C-incorporation in GaNxAs1-x as a reference system in a close coupled showerhead MOVPE reactor to minimize gas-phase reactions for a wide range of growth parameters and precursors. The N-incorporation was always proportional to the N/As-ratio, while the absolute N-molar-flow, growth rate and interaction time show only a minor influence, indicating little gas-phase pre-reactions. Pyrolysis and pre-reactions between radicals on the surface have been taken into account according to the used precursor combination. We identified the group-III-methyl-groups as the major C-source and found a linear correlation between the incorporated N and C. GaN0.01As0.99 could be grown with C-background below 10(16) atoms/cm(3) for optimized conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据