4.5 Article

A simplified critical illness severity scoring system (CISSS): Development and internal validation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 21-28

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.029

关键词

APACHE; Automated; Computerized; Illness severity score; Intensive care units; Mortality

资金

  1. VA Office of Rural Health
  2. Center for Comprehensive Access & Delivery Research & Evaluation (CADRE), Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Program [CIN-13-412]
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center [14380]
  4. Health Services Research and development (HSR&D) Service through the Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center [CIN 13-412]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to develop a simplified critical illness severity scoring system with high prediction accuracy for 30-day mortality using commonly available variables. The newly created system showed excellent performance in predicting 30-day mortality internally and required easily extracted commonly used variables from electronic health records.
Purpose: To create a simplified critical illness severity scoring system with high prediction accuracy for 30-day mortality using only commonly available variables. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of ICU admissions 2010-2015 in 306 ICUs in 117 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. We randomly divided our cohort into a training dataset (75%) and a validation dataset (25%). We created a critical illness severity scoring system (CISSS) using age, comorbidities, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, temperature, respiratory rate, hematocrit, white blood cell count, creatinine, sodium, glucose, albumin, bilirubin, bicarbonate, use of invasive mechanical ventilation, and whether the admission was surgical or not. We validated the performance of CISSS to predict 30-day mortality internally. Results: After excluding 31,743 re-admissions, we divided our sample (n = 534,001) into a training (n = 400,613) and a validation dataset ( n = 133,388). In the training dataset, the area under the curve (AUC) of CISSS was 0.847(95%CI = 0.845-0.850). In the validation dataset, the AUC was 0.848 (95%CI = 0.844-0.852), the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was 1.00 (95%CI = 0.98-1.02), and Brier's score for 30-day mortality was 0.058 (95%CI = 0.057-0.059). CISSS calibration was acceptable. Conclusions: CISSS has very good performance and requires only commonly used variables that can be easily extracted by electronic health records. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据