4.8 Article

Design and Testing of a Cabotegravir Implant for HIV Prevention

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 330, 期 -, 页码 658-668

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.024

关键词

Cabotegravir; Subcutaneous implant; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; Hot-melt extrusion; Hydrophilic poly(ether urethane); Reservoir device

资金

  1. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource [NSF ECCS-1542205]
  2. State of Illinois
  3. International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN)
  4. NIH NIAID [UM1 AI120184]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a long-acting antiretroviral implant designed to release cabotegravir for several months, aiming to protect high-risk individuals from HIV infection. In vivo experiments in rhesus macaques demonstrated that the implant could steadily release cabotegravir and quickly reduce plasma levels to undetectable levels after removal. The findings suggest that this implant has potential for HIV prevention in high-risk populations.
Long-acting antiretroviral implants could help protect high-risk individuals from HIV infection. We describe the design and testing of a long-acting reservoir subcutaneous implant capable of releasing cabotegravir for several months. We compressed cabotegravir and excipients into cylindrical pellets and heat-sealed them in tubing composed of hydrophilic poly(ether-urethane) -. The implants have a 47 mm lumen length, 3.6 mm outer diameter, and 200 mu m wall thickness. Four cabotegravir pellets were sealed in the membrane, with a total drug loading of 274 +/- 3 mg. In vivo, the implants released 348 +/- 107 mu g/day (median value per implant, N = 41) of cabotegravir in rhesus macaques. Five implants generated an average cabotegravir plasma concentration of 373 ng/ml in rhesus macaques. The non-human primates tolerated the implant without gross pathology or microscopic signs of histopathology compared to placebo implants. Cabotegravir plasma levels in macaques dropped below detectable levels within two weeks after the removal of the implants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据