4.6 Article

Numerical-Based Approach for Updating Simulation Input in Real Time

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000948

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC Collaborative Research and Development Grant [CRDPJ 492657]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simulation has been assisting engineers in decision-making by modeling inputs as probabilistic distributions. Integrating multiple information sources dynamically is crucial in construction projects to improve the accuracy and reliability of simulation models. This novel approach of coupling MCMC-based numerical method with weighted GA can effectively update input models in real-time, enhancing the representation of probabilistic input models in MC-driven simulations.
Simulation has assisted engineers in various decision-making processes for decades. Particularly, modeling inputs as probabilistic distributions enables these stochastic models to capture uncertainties and represent random processes. A significant number of studies have developed an accurate input model from a single source type (i.e., quantitative observations or subjective information), but few have integrated multiple information sources dynamically. Nevertheless, the latter situation is common in construction projects, especially during project execution when quantitative observations and expert opinions need to be factored into models in real time. This paper is the first to propose coupling a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based numerical method with a weighted geometric average (GA) as a novel approach to systematically update inputs for stochastic simulation models. The proposed method handles both objective and subjective project data to effectively update the input models in real time, producing more accurate representations of probabilistic input models for any Monte Carlo (MC)-driven simulation. This method considerably improves the reliability, accuracy, and practicality of stochastic simulation models. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据