4.7 Article

Fault, detection and diagnosis for building cooling system with a tree-structured learning method

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 540-551

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.017

关键词

Fault detection and diagnosis (FDD); Building cooling system; Data-driven method; Pattern classification; Machine learning method

资金

  1. Republic of Singapore's

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to save energy and improve the performance of building environment regulation, there is an increasing need for fault detection and diagnosis (FDD). This paper investigates the effectiveness of tree-structured learning method for FDD of building cooling system. Researchers have been tackling building FDD task with a wide variety of techniques, such as analytical model-based, signal-based and knowledge-based methods. Recently data-driven method has shown its advantage in dealing with complex systems with random penetrations. Existing work on data-driven FDD merely formulates the task as a pure fault type classification problem, whereas fault severity levels and their inter-dependence have long been ignored. We propose a novel data-driven strategy that adopts structured labeling to include the dependence information and describe the severity levels in a large margin learning framework. A Tree-structured Fault Dependence Kernel (TFDK) method is derived and a corresponding on-line learning algorithm is developed for streaming data. As an improvement of traditional classification methods (e.g. SVM), TFDK encodes tree-structured fault dependence in its feature mapping, and takes regularized misclassification cost as learning objective. Following the ASHRAE Research Project 1043 (RP-1043), the strategy is applied to the FDD of a 90-ton centrifugal water-cooled chiller. Experimental results show that compared to previous data-driven methods, TFDK can greatly improve the FDD performance as well as recognize the fault severity levels with high accuracy. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据