4.7 Article

Evaluation of kinetics and thermodynamics of interaction between immobilized SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and specific antibodies by total internal reflection ellipsometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 594, 期 -, 页码 195-203

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.100

关键词

Sars-CoV-2 nucleoprotein; Diagnostics of COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Total internal reflection ellipsometry (TIRE); Surface plasmon resonance; Antigen-antibody complex formation kinetics; Optical biosensors

资金

  1. European Social Fund [09.3.3LMTK712190106]
  2. Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the pandemic, various methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnostics were developed, which included antibody and antigen tests. Recent research has shown that the interaction between SCoV2-rN and anti-SCoV2-rN antibodies plays a crucial role in guiding the development of new medications.
During the pandemic, different methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnostics were developed, including antibody and antigen tests. For a better understanding of the interaction mechanism between SARS-CoV-2 virus proteins and specific antibodies, total internal reflection ellipsometry based evaluation of the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (SCoV2-rN) and anti-SCoV2-rN antibodies was performed. Results show that the appropriate mathematical model, which takes into account the formation of an intermediate complex, can be applied for the evaluation of SCoV2-rN/anti-SCoV2-rN complex formation kinetics. The calculated steric factor indicated that SCoV2-rN/anti-SCoV2-rN complex formation has very strict steric requirements. Estimated Gibbs free energy (Delta G(Assoc)) for SCoV-rN and antiSCoV-rN binding was determined as -34 kJ/mol. The reported findings are useful for the design of new analytical systems for the determination of anti-SCoV2-rN antibodies and for the development of new anti-SARS-CoV-2 medications. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据