4.7 Article

N, O co-doped chlorella-based biomass carbon modified separator for lithium-sulfur battery with high capacity and long cycle performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 585, 期 -, 页码 43-50

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.11.084

关键词

Biomass carbon; Polysulfides; Chlorella-based biomass carbon interlayer; Modified separator; Li-S battery

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2019YFC1906402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N, O co-doped chlorella-based biomass carbon prepared by chemical activation method shows promising potential in enhancing the performance of lithium-sulfur batteries, improving cycling stability and rate capability. Strong chemical adsorption for LiPs contributes to the enhanced cycle performance of the batteries.
As a lithium-ion secondary battery with high energy density, lithium-sulfur batteries have very bright development prospects. But the shuttle effect is still a thorny issue in the development process. The N, O co-doped chlorella-based biomass carbon (CBBC) synthesized by chemical activation method possesses a microporous and mesoporous composite structure, large specific surface area, and good electrical conductivity. The CBBC interlayer can improve the wettability between the separator and the electrolyte, and accelerate the transmission of Li+. N, O heteroatoms have a strong chemical adsorption operation for LiPs. The modified separator restrains lithium polysulfide through physical barriers and chemical adsorption, and improves the capacity and cycle performance of lithium-sulfur batteries. The batteries with CBBC exhibit excellent cycling stability (0.067% per cycle at 0.5C) and better rate performance (918 mAh g(-1) at 2C). The first discharge capacity at 0.05C was 1540 mAh g(-1). Even after 600 cycles the discharge capacity retains 656 mAh g(-1) at 0.5C. The low price and simple preparation of CBBC interlayer is an attractive choice for improving lithium-sulfur batteries. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据