4.4 Review

The role of acetazolamide in sleep apnea at sea level: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 1295-1304

出版社

AMER ACAD SLEEP MEDICINE
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.9116

关键词

acetazolamide; central sleep apnea; obstructive sleep apnea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The drug acetazolamide has shown significant improvement in the apnea-hypopnea index and several sleep metrics in central sleep apnea. However, its effectiveness is not significant in obstructive sleep apnea.
Study Objectives: The recognition of specific endotypes as drivers of sleep apnea suggests the need of therapies targeting individual mechanisms. Acetazolamide is known to stabilize respiration at high altitude but benefits at sea level are less well understood. Methods: All controlled studies of acetazolamide in obstructive sleep apnea and/or central sleep apnea (CSA) were evaluated. The primary outcome was the apnea-hypopnea index. Results: Fifteen trials with a total of 256 patients were pooled in our systematic review. Acetazolamide reduced the overall apnea- hypopnea index (mean difference [MD] -15.82, 95% CI: -21.91 to -9.74, P < .00001) in central sleep apnea (MD -22.60, 95% CI: -29.11 to -16.09, P < .00001), but not in obstructive sleep apnea (MD -10.29, 95% CI: -33.34 to 12.77, P = .38). Acetazolamide reduced the respiratory related arousal index (MD -0.82, 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.08, P = .03), improved partial arterial of oxygen (MD 11.62, 95% CI: 9.13-14.11, P < .00001), mean oxygen saturation (MD 1.78, 95% CI: 0.53-3.04, P = .005), total sleep time (MD 25.74, 95% CI: 4.10-47.38, P = .02), N2 sleep (MD 3.34, 95% CI: 0.12-6.56, P = .04) and sleep efficiency (MD 4.83, 95% CI: 0.53-9.13, P = .03). Conclusions: Acetazolamide improves the apnea-hypopnea index and several sleep metrics in central sleep apnea. The drug may be of clinical benefit in patients with high loop gain apnea of various etiologies and patterns. The existence of high heterogeneity is an important limitation in applicability of our analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据