4.6 Article

Regenerative periodontal surgery and orthodontic tooth movement in stage IV periodontitis: A retrospective practice-based cohort study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 668-678

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13442

关键词

bone level; bovine bone mineral; collagen; enamel matrix derivative; membrane; orthodontic tooth movement; pathologic tooth migration; regenerative periodontal therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effectiveness of regenerative treatment combined with consecutive orthodontic tooth movements in patients with stage IV periodontitis. The combination therapy resulted in favorable outcomes up to 4 years, including significant bone level gain and reduction in probing pocket depths.
Aim Evaluation of the effectiveness of regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects in combination with consecutive orthodontic tooth movements in stage IV periodontitis. Material and methods A total of 526 intra-bony defects in 48 patients were analysed after regenerative therapy using collagen-deproteinized bovine bone mineral with or without collagen membrane or enamel matrix derivative followed by orthodontic tooth movement initiated 3 months after surgery. Changes in radiographic bone levels (BL) and probing pocket depths (PPD) were evaluated after 1 year and up to 4 years. Results Tooth loss amounted to 0.57%. Mean BL gain was 4.67 mm (+/- 2.5 mm) after 1 year and 4.85 mm (+/- 2.55 mm) after up to 4 years. Mean PPD was significantly reduced from 6.00 mm (+/- 2.09 mm) at baseline to 3.45 mm (+/- 1.2 mm) after 1 year, and to 3.12 mm (+/- 1.36 mm) after 2-4 years. Pocket closure (PPD <= 4 mm) was accomplished in 87% of all defects. Adjunctive antibiotic therapy did not show any statistically significant impact on treatment outcomes. Conclusions Within the limits of this retrospective study design, the findings suggest that the combination of regenerative treatment and consecutive orthodontic tooth movements resulted in favourable results up to 4 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据