4.7 Article

Method Uncertainty Is Essential for Reliable Confidence Statements of Precipitation Projections

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 1227-1240

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0289.1

关键词

Climate change; Ensembles; General circulation models; Model comparison; Precipitation

资金

  1. CMIP5
  2. CMIP6
  3. ESGF
  4. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. European Union Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 [603864]
  6. U.K. BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  7. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
  8. Natural Environment Research Council National Capability award
  9. Australian Research Council [DE180100638]
  10. French National Research Agency [ANR-17-MPGA-0016]
  11. Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models [JPMXD0717935457]
  12. Climate Change Adaptation Research Program of NIES
  13. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-MPGA-0016] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  14. NERC [NE/R009554/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precipitation events are influenced by climate change, but different modeling approaches can lead to varying future projections. There is uncertainty in climate modeling which can greatly impact estimated precipitation changes. Confidence is higher in extreme precipitation changes compared to mean precipitation, highlighting the importance of considering multiple sources of climate projections.
Precipitation events cause disruption around the world and will be altered by climate change. However, different climate modeling approaches can result in different future precipitation projections. The corresponding method uncertainty is rarely explicitly calculated in climate impact studies and major reports but can substantially change estimated precipitation changes. A comparison across five commonly used modeling activities shows that, for changes in mean precipitation, less than half of the regions analyzed had significant changes between the present climate and 1.5 degrees C global warming for the majority of modeling activities. This increases to just over half of the regions for changes between present climate and 2 degrees C global warming. There is much higher confidence in changes in maximum 1-day precipitation than in mean precipitation, indicating the robust influence of thermodynamics in the climate change effect on extremes. We also find that none of the modeling activities captures the full range of estimates from the other methods in all regions. Our results serve as an uncertainty map to help interpret which regions require a multimethod approach. Our analysis highlights the risk of overreliance on any single modeling activity and the need for confidence statements in major synthesis reports to reflect this method uncertainty. Considering multiple sources of climate projections should reduce the risks of policymakers being unprepared for impacts of warmer climates relative to using single-method projections to make decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据