4.7 Article

BEES: Real-time occupant feedback and environmental learning framework for collaborative thermal management in multi-zone, multi-occupant buildings

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 142-152

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.084

关键词

Collaborative comfort management; Autonomous thermostat control; Multi-zone environment control; Smart HVAC operation; Occupant feedback interface

资金

  1. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1230687] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1608613] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work we present an end-to-end framework designed for enabling occupant feedback collection and incorporating the feedback data towards energy efficient operation of a building. We have designed a mobile application that occupants can use on their smart phones to provide their thermal preference feedback. When relaying the occupant feedback to the central server the mobile application also uses indoor location techniques to tie the occupant preference to their current thermal zone. Texas Instruments sensortags are used for real time zonal temperature readings. The mobile application relays the occupant preference along with the location to a central server that also hosts our learning algorithm to learn the environment and using occupant feedback calculates the optimal temperature set point. The entire process is triggered upon change of occupancy, environmental conditions, and/or occupant preference. The learning algorithm is scheduled to run at regular intervals to respond dynamically to environmental and occupancy changes. We describe results from experimental studies in two different settings: a single family residential home setting and in a university based laboratory space setting. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据