4.7 Article

Thermal conductivity of cement paste containing waste glass powder, metakaolin and limestone filler as supplementary cementitious material

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125018

关键词

Thermal conductivity; Cement paste; Metakaolin; Waste glass powder; Limestone filler

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51278157]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that adding metakaolin increased thermal conductivity in cement paste, while adding waste glass powder and limestone filler decreased thermal conductivity. Cement paste containing metakaolin exhibited lower porosity and higher compressive and flexural strength.
The use of waste glass powder, metakaolin and limestone filler in cement-based materials is attractive for recycling the waste and reducing carbon dioxide emissions from cement factories. In this laboratory study, the effects of waste glass powder, metakaolin and limestone filler on the thermal conductivity, mechanical properties, hydration products and pore structures of cement paste were investigated. The results indicated that the addition 25% of metakaolin in cement paste increased the thermal conductivity by 54%. While, the addition 25% of waste glass powder and limestone filler decreased the thermal conductivity of cement paste by 24.05% and 36.26%, respectively. The cement paste containing meta kaolin exhibited lower porosity and higher compressive and flexural strength than pure cement paste. The incorporation of waste glass powder and limestone filler in cement paste decreased the compressive and flexural strength while increased the porosity. Under the same dosage conditions, the cement paste with limestone filler had a higher porosity than that with waste glass powder. This research provides the reference for application of waste glass powder, metakaolin and limestone filler to produce green building materials with excellent thermal conductivity. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据