4.2 Article

Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium, Solubility, and Critical States in an Acetic Acid-n-Butyl Alcohol-n-Butyl Acetate-Water System at 328.15 K and 101.3 kPa: Topology of Phase Diagrams and NRTL Modeling

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 1466-1474

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.0c01066

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [20-73-10007]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [20-73-10007] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the liquid-liquid equilibrium, solubility, and critical states of the quaternary system through gas chromatography and cloud-point technique. Topological analysis of phase diagrams was conducted, and simulation using a two-liquid model showed good agreement with experimental data. Comparative analysis with binary, ternary, and quaternary mixtures was carried out to discuss the location of critical compositions and construct phase diagrams in 2D and 3D concentration spaces. Features of each phase diagram were also discussed.
Compositions of coexisting phases (liquid-liquid equilibrium), solubility, and critical states for the quaternary acetic acid-n-butyl alcohol-n-butyl acetate-water system were carried out at 328.15 K and 101.3 kPa. The results of the work include topological analysis of phase diagrams. The data on liquid phases were determined by gas chromatography analysis. Solubility results and critical compositions were obtained by a cloud-point technique method. Simulation was performed using a nonrandom two-liquid model. Calculated results are in sufficient agreement with experimental data. A comparative analysis of experimental, calculated, and literature data was carried out for binary, ternary, and quaternary mixtures. The location of the critical compositions at different temperatures in the concentration space is discussed. The corresponding phase diagrams are constructed in 2D and 3D concentration spaces. The features of each of the phase diagrams are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据