4.5 Article

Understanding the role of miRNAs for improvement of tea quality and stress tolerance

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 328, 期 -, 页码 34-46

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.12.019

关键词

miRNAs; Tea; Stress; Quality; Gene expression regulation

资金

  1. DST-SERB [ECR/2017/000710]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

miRNAs play a significant role in regulating stress tolerance in plants, with a particular focus on tea plants as an economically important crop. Understanding the function of miRNAs can help enhance stress resistance in tea plants, providing important guidance for crop improvement and quality enhancement of tea leaves.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are an emerging class of small non-coding RNAs that exhibit important role in regulation of gene expression, mostly through the mechanism of cleavage and/or inhibition of translation of target mRNAs during or after transcription. Although much has been unravelled about the role of miRNAs in diverse biological processes like maintenance of functional integrity of genes and genome, growth and development, metabolism, and adaptive responses towards biotic and abiotic stresses in plants, not much is known on their specific roles in majority of cash crops an area of investigation with potentially significant and gainful economic implications. Tea (Camellia sinensis) is globally the second most consumed beverage after water and its cultivation has major agro-economic and social ramifications. In recent years, global tea production has been greatly challenged by many biotic and abiotic stress factors and a deeper understanding of molecular processes regulating stress adaptation in this largely under investigated crop stands to significantly facilitate potential crop improvement strategies towards durable stress tolerance. This review endeavours to highlight recent advances in our understanding of the role of miRNAs in regulating stress tolerance traits in tea plant with additional focus on their role in determining tea quality attributes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据