4.7 Article

Investigation of Organic Related Pores in Unconventional Reservoir and Its Quantitative Evaluation

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 4699-4709

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00590

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [16CX05004A]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2014DQ007]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41404086]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015T80759]
  5. National Key Foundation for Exploring Scientific Instrument of China [2013YQ170463]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pores in organic matters are important for-unconventional reservoirs since a large amount of absorbed hydrocarbons reside in these spaces. An integrated method to quantify organic pores, using low field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is introduced in this paper. Relationships between the organic related porosity and geochemical parameters are also discussed. Resistivity, velocity, density, and natural gamma ray spectra are measured simultaneously to investigate petrophysical responses of organic pores, aiming to predict the organic related porosity using conventional petrophysical data. Results show that the NMR signal of samples under the dry state is a good indicator of organic pores and can be calibrated to the organic related porosity. The organic related porosity is,positively correlated with total organic carbon content (TOC), absorbed free gaseous hydrocarbons (S-0), absorbed free liquid hydrocarbons (S-1), and residual petroleum potential (S-2) but negatively correlated with residual carbons (RCs). The organic related porosity is positively correlated with thorium content (Th), natural gamma intensity (GR), and resistivity (R), whereas it is negatively correlated with density (DEN), compression wave velocity (Vp), and shear wave velocity (Vs). The model achieves favorable results, which can be generalized to predict the in situ organic related porosity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据