4.7 Article

Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy Efficiency, and Cost of Synthetic Fuel Production Using Electrochemical CO2 Conversion and the Fischer-Tropsch Process

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 5980-5989

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00665

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG02005ER46260]
  2. Department of Energy through an STTR grant [DE-SC0004453]
  3. National Science Foundation [CTS 05-47617]
  4. International Institute of Carbon Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER)
  5. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study seeks to explore whether electrochemical reduction of CO2 (using current US average and future low carbon electricity) will become a viable route for the reuse of CO2 for producing synthetic fuel. This paper presents the results of a technical and economic analysis conducted for a pathway that converts CO2 released from fossil fuel-burning power plants to diesel fuel via electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO and the Fischer-Tropsch process. Currently achievable performance levels for CO2 electrolyzers and the Fischer Tropsch process were used to compute key metrics, including (i) cost of the synthetic fuel, (ii) well-to-gate CO2 emissions, and (iii) overall energy efficiency. An engineering and economic model framework was developed for the investigation. The discounted cash flow analysis method was employed to calculate the cost of diesel fuel using a 500 MW power plant as the CO2 source. The model takes into account capital expenditures as well as operating costs for the reactors and auxiliaries. The final cost varies from 3.80 to 9.20 dollars per gallon in 2010 US dollars depending on the projected level of technology achieved. The WTG CO2 emissions vary from 180% (nearly twice) to a reduction of 75% compared to that of the business as usual scenario without carbon sequestration. The well-to-gate energy efficiency varies from 41 to 65%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据