4.6 Article

Charge dynamics and thermal properties of epoxy based micro and nano hybrid composites at high temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 138, 期 28, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.50676

关键词

composites; dielectric properties; differential scanning calorimetry (DSC); thermal properties; thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018QNA4017]
  2. One-hundred Talents Program of Zhejiang University [A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of different micro and nano AlN fillers on the electrical performances and thermal properties of hybrid composites at high temperatures. The results show that nano-fillers enhance the electrical performances but decrease the apparent mobility and activation energy of the composites. Additionally, a hypothetical mechanism is proposed to explain the charge carrier injection and transport of the composites at different temperatures.
This paper presents the effects of the filler type and testing temperature on the charge dynamics and thermal properties of the epoxy resin. The micro-nano hybrid composites with different content of the micro and nano aluminum nitride (AlN) fillers are fabricated. The morphology of micro-nano hybrid composites is characterized. Electrical testing and thermal analysis methods are adopted to analyze its electrical and thermal performance. The results show that the space charge accumulation is suppressed and the charge decay process is facilitated in the hybrid composites. The electrical performances of the hybrid composites are enhanced by the nano-fillers. The apparent mobility and activation energy are decreased with nano-AlN fillers in the composites at the high temperature. The glass transition temperature and thermal stability of the materials is improved with the nano-AlN. A hypothetical mechanism is proposed to explain the charge carrier injection and transport of the composites at different temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据