4.5 Article

Estimation of economic value for efficiency and animal health and welfare traits, teat and udder structure, in Canadian Angus cattle

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS
卷 138, 期 3, 页码 314-325

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12540

关键词

conjoint analysis; economic weight; genetic selection index; teat and udder score

资金

  1. Alberta Innovates Bio Solutions [2020F012R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic evaluations for teat and udder structure developed by the Canadian Angus Association have significant impacts on efficiencies, animal health, and welfare. Including these functional traits in genetic selection programs is crucial for profitability and further longitudinal studies are needed to understand their effects on efficiencies and animal health and welfare.
The Canadian Angus Association recently developed genetic evaluations for teat and udder structure, which impact efficiencies, and animal health and welfare. Genetic selection tools are most effective incorporated into economic selection indexes. An important factor in the development of economic indexes is the estimation of the economic value and discounted gene expression coefficients, and thereby the economic weight, of each trait. Traditional estimation methods, interrogation of previous studies quantifying the impact of the traits and bioeconomic modelling, were reinforced using producer surveys that employed pairwise ranking methods. Estimates of discounted genetic expression coefficients, economic value and economic weight for teat and udder score in Canadian Angus cattle were 0.31 per sire, $52.47, and $16.91 per score change on a per calf born basis, respectively, indicating that functional traits such as teat and udder structure have a significant impact on profitability and should be included in genetic selection programmes. Limitations in previous studies illustrate the need for longitudinal studies on traits that impact efficiencies and animal health and welfare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据