4.7 Article

Excellent thermal stability and high quantum efficiency orange-red-emitting AlPO4:Eu3+ phosphors for WLED application

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 853, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156941

关键词

Orange-red-emitting phosphors; Judd-Ofelt intensity parameters; AlPO4:Eu3+; Warm white LED

资金

  1. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [103.03-2017.39]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Orange-red-emitting AlPO4:Eu3+ phosphors were synthesized by a co-precipitation method, exhibiting strong emissions under 394 nm excitation and maintaining stability at high temperatures.
Orange-red-emitting AlPO4:Eu3+ phosphors have been systematically synthesized by a co-precipitation method. Under the excitation at 394 nm these phosphor shows strong orange-red emissions with the strongest peaks at 588, 594, 685 and 700 nm. The highest PL intensity is achieved at the dopant concentration of 3 mol% and the annealing temperature of 1000 degrees C. Additionally, 84% of the roomtemperature emission intensity is still maintained at 160 degrees C, indicating a good thermal stability and practicality. By a Judd-Ofelt (JO) analysis, it is demonstrated that the symmetry sites surrounding Eu3+ ions are influenced by the dopant level. The lowest value of Omega(2)/Omega(4) ratio of 0.27 reveals the highest symmetry site at the Eu3+ concentration of 3 mol%. The CIE 1931 color chromaticity coordinates (x, y) and the activation energy of the AlPO4:3%Eu3+ phosphor are (0.5602; 0.3862) and 0.28 eV, respectively. The color coordinates of the phosphor coated on NUV LED chip and its quantum efficiency (QE) are (0.5573, 0.3253) and 38.7%, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a calculated QE of AlPO4:Eu3+-based orange-red-emitting LED is reported. The obtained results show a great potential of using orange-red-emitting AlPO4:Eu3+ phosphor for WLED application. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据