4.7 Article

Experimental determination of phase diagram at 450 °C in the Zn-Fe-Al ternary system

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 854, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157163

关键词

C. Phase diagrams; Phase transitions; A. Coating materials; Intermetallics

资金

  1. Iron and Steel Institute of Japan (ISIJ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase equilibria in multi-phase Zn-Fe-Al alloys were experimentally measured to determine a precise iso-thermal phase diagram at 450 degrees C. The solubility ranges of various intermetallic compound phases on both Fe-Zn and Fe-Al sides were consistent with binary data, with the discovery of a new Fe(Al, Zn)(6) intermetallic compound phase in the Al-rich region at 450 degrees C.
Phase equilibria in multi-phase Zn-Fe-Al alloys were experimentally measured using a field-emission electron probe micro-analyzer for alloy samples, and a precise iso-thermal phase diagram at 450 degrees C in the entire composition range of the Zn-Fe-Al ternary system, except for the Fe-rich corner, was determined. The ternary solubility ranges of the Gamma-Fe4Zn9, Gamma(1)-Fe21.2Zn80.8, delta(1k)-FeZn7, and zeta-FeZn13 on the Fe-Zn side and of the zeta-FeAl2, eta-Fe2Al5, and theta-Fe4Al13 on the Fe-Al side were consistent with the latest corresponding binary data, whereas no delta(1p)-Fe13Zn126 phase was detected. The single-phase region of the Gamma(2)-Fe8Zn87Al4 ternary intermetallic compound phase is significantly narrower than that reported in the previous studies. The solubility of Fe in the liquid phase increased consistently and continuously from the value in the Zn-Fe binary system (0.6 at.%) up to 1.2 at.% at 31 at.% Al with increasing Al content. In the Al-rich portion of the phase diagram at 450 degrees C, the Fe(Al, Zn)(6) intermetallic compound phase was newly discovered, and confirmed to be an isomorph extended from the FeAl6 phase which is metastable in the Fe-Al binary system. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据