4.7 Article

Reducing the acceptor levels of p-type β-Ga2O3 by (metal, N) co-doping approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 854, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157247

关键词

Density functional theory; p-type; beta-Ga2O3; Co-doping; Acceptor level

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB2202900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61804111]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M643578]
  4. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2020JQ-310]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. Initiative Postdocs Supporting Program [BX20180234]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fabricating p-type beta-Ga2O3 with shallow acceptor levels is crucial for devices based on beta-Ga2O3. The proposed (electron-poor metal, N) co-doping method effectively reduces acceptor levels and hinders the formation of vacancies, thereby limiting the formation of p-type beta-Ga2O3.
Fabricating p-type beta-Ga2O3 with shallow acceptor levels is vital to the application of beta-Ga2O3 based devices. Herein, we propose a potential approach, (electron-poor metal, N) co-doping, to effectively decrease the acceptor levels. The (electron-poor metal, N) co-doping is easier to be realized compared to the pure N doping for beta-Ga2O3. Moreover, partial co-doping further shifts up the Ga-O bonding orbitals and down the dopant-O anti-bonding orbitals and the unoccupied p orbitals of N and O ions, thus the acceptor levels can be significantly decreased when the pure metal doping is replaced by the co-doping method. The acceptor levels of (Mg, N) and (Zn, N) co-doped beta-Ga2O3 are as low as 0.16, and 0.01 eV, respectively. More importantly, (metal dopant with p orbitals, N) co-doping hinders the formation of 0vacancy which limits the formation of p-type beta-Ga2O3. These results suggest that (metal, N) co-doping might be a potential way to achieve an effective p-type beta-Ga2O3. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据