4.7 Article

Deformation behavior of Mg-5Y-2Nd-0.5Zr alloys with different Sm additions

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 856, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158201

关键词

Mg-RE alloy; Sm; Precipitate; Dislocation; Twinning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51571084]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201908410208, JP19k23566]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By adding Sm, the microstructure of Mg-5Y-2Nd-xSm-0.5Zr alloys was refined, leading to a significant decrease in grain size as Sm content increased. The alloy exhibited improved compressive strength and maximum strain with the addition of Sm.
Herein, we studied the microstructural evolution and deformation behavior of aged Mg-5Y-2Nd-xSm-0.5Zr (x = 1, 3, and 5 wt%) alloys during uniaxial compression at room temperature by transmission electron microscopy and quasi-in-situ electron backscatter diffraction techniques. The microstructures of Mg-5Y-2Nd-xSm-0.5Zr alloys are refined by the addition of Sm, with more occurrences of Mg(Nd, Sm) precipitates. The average grain size decreased significantly with increasing Sm content, from 80.4 mu m (1 wt% Sm) to 64.8 mu m (3 wt% Sm) and 50.0 mu m (5 wt% Sm). The Mg-5Y-2Nd-3Sm-0.5Zr alloy exhibited a maximum compressive strength of 390.1 MPa and a maximum strain (epsilon) of 0.103 at room temperature; {10-12} tensile twinning and dislocation slips are the main plastic deformation modes of Mg-5Y-2Nd-xSm-0.5Zr alloys during compression at room temperature. A number of < a > and < c + a > dislocations were observed in the aged Mg-5Y-2Nd-3Sm-0.5Zr alloy. The optimized ductility value is attributable to grain refinement; elemental Sm promotes the activation of the non-basal < c + a > slip dislocations and interactions between twins and < c + a > dislocations. The strengthening mechanism mainly includes solid solution, fine-grain, and precipitation strengthening. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据