4.7 Article

Superelasticity over a wide temperature range in metastable β-Ti shape memory alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 853, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157090

关键词

Titanium alloy; Dynamic mechanical analysis; Synchrotron diffraction; Martensites; Point defects

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1106600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51831006]
  3. Hubei Polytechnic University Talent Introduction Project [20xjz14R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A unique metastable beta-Ti shape memory alloy with classic superelasticity over a wide temperature range is presented in this study. The superelasticity is experimentally verified to originate from two concurrent nano-scale transitions, providing potential for advanced applications and designs of beta-Ti based SMAs.
Shape memory alloys (SMAs) offer many technological advantages in various applications due to shape memory effect and superelasticity. Among them, superelasticity persists within a narrow temperature range (<100 K), beyond which, superelasticity disappears due to the loss of reversibility in the thermoelastic martensite. Here we present a unique metastable beta-Ti SMA of Ti-19Nb-10Zr-1Fe, showing the classic superelasticity over a wide temperature range from 123 K to 373 K. It is verified experimentally to be originated from two concurrent nano-scale transitions: beta -> alpha '' martensitic nanodomains (strain glass transition), and beta -> nano-sized a-omega precipitates. Requiring no pre-training, a classic superelasticity with stress plateaus was associated with the reversible stress-induced strain glass to martensite transformation by in-situ SXRD. Further, a temperature-stress phase diagram was constructed, which facilitates the understanding of wide temperature superelasticity in metastable beta-Ti SMAs, and may serve as a guide map for future designing and application of advanced beta-Ti based SMAs. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据