4.7 Article

Expression Pattern of Starch Biosynthesis Genes in Relation to the Starch Molecular Structure in High-Amylose Maize

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 2805-2815

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07354

关键词

high-amylose starch; molecular structure; gene expression; developing endosperm; maize

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20191407]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province [19KJA520001]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on the molecular structure and expression levels of starch biosynthesis-related genes in high-amylose maize (HAM) and normal maize (NM) genotypes revealed distinct patterns of starch content and molecular size at different time points after pollination. Correlation analyses indicated that the expression levels of specific genes were associated with the content of starch and the molecular structure of amylopectin in different genotypes.
The molecular structure and the expression levels of starch biosynthesis-related genes of three types of high-amylose maize (HAM) genotypes and one normal maize (NM) genotype at 5-35 days after pollination (DAP) were studied. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis showed that the molecular size of amylopectin molecules in NM increased from 5 to 35 DAP and the amylose content in HAM genotypes increased from 15 to 35 DAP. Correlation analysis for both NM and HAMs combined showed that SBEIIb and ISAII were negatively correlated with the contents of amylose and long amylopectin chains (DP > 30) and positively correlated with the content of short amylopectin chains (DP <= 31) and the molecular size of amylopectin molecules. Correlation analysis for only the HAMs showed that amylose content was negatively correlated with SBEI and SSIIa. In both correlation analyses, SSIIa showed a negative correlation with the average chain lengths of amylose chains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据