4.7 Article

The association between placebo arm inclusion and adverse event rates in antidepressant randomized controlled trials: An examination of the Nocebo Effect

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 140-147

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.004

关键词

Expectation; Major Depressive Disorder; Side Effects; Study Design; Placebo; Nocebo

资金

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto
  2. Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that among patients receiving active treatment in antidepressant trials, drug-drug trials had lower rates of adverse events compared to other designs. However, there were no significant differences in adverse event rates across different designs for patients receiving placebo.
Background: Antidepressant efficacy is influenced by patient expectations and, in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the probability of receiving a placebo. It is unclear whether tolerability demonstrates a similar pattern. This study aimed to determine whether study design influences adverse event (AE) rates in antidepressant trials for subjects receiving active treatment or placebo. Methods: RCTs comparing one antidepressant to another antidepressant, placebo, or both in major depressive disorder (MDD) (1996-2018) were retrieved from Medline and PsycINFO. Clinicaltrials.gov was searched for unpublished trials. Of 1,997 studies screened, 77 trials were included. Studies were classified as drug-drug, drug-drug-placebo, or drug-placebo based on design and overall number of subjects experiencing any AE was recorded. Subgroup meta-analysis of proportions and meta-regression techniques were used to compare AE rates across study designs in patients receiving active antidepressant treatment and placebo. Results: Among the actively treated, AE rates were lower in drug-drug-trials (58.5%) compared to drug-drug placebo (75.7%) and drug-placebo (76.4%) (the model reported coefficients for percent differences between AE rates of different study designs were B=17.0, p<0.001 and B=17.8, p<0.001, respectively). AE rates in patients receiving placebo were not different between study designs. Limitations: The present study is limited by the diverse range of study populations, variability in reporting of AEs, and specific antidepressants employed in the included trials. Conclusions: The inclusion of a placebo arm in the study design was unexpectedly associated with higher rates of AEs among patients receiving active medication in antidepressant trials. This observation has important implications for interpretation of trial tolerability findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据