4.7 Article

Ruminations and their correlates in depressive episodes: Between-group comparison in patients with unipolar or bipolar depression and healthy controls

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 1-6

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.064

关键词

Rumination; cognitive functions; emotion regulation; resilience; bipolar depression; unipolar depression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that patients with unipolar depression showed higher levels of rumination and performed better in some neuropsychological tests compared to those with bipolar depression. There was no significant difference in rumination between the two depression groups when duration of illness was controlled. A negative relationship was observed between rumination and emotion regulation as well as psychological resilience in both patient groups, but not in healthy controls.
Background: Rumination is an important feature of affective disorders. Relationships between rumination, cognitive function, emotion regulation, and psychological resilience have been examined in unipolar depression; but few studies have determined whether unipolar and bipolar depressive episodes are distinguishable in terms of these variables. This study examined rumination in relation to clinical and cognitive variables in patients with unipolar depression or bipolar depression, and healthy controls. Methods: In total, 150 participants (50 bipolar, 50 unipolar, 50 controls) were included. Assessments comprised the Ruminative Response Scale-Short Form, Positive Beliefs about Rumination Scale, Negative Beliefs about Rumination Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Stroop Test, and Trail Making Test A and B. Results: The unipolar group had significantly higher scores in ruminative response and performed better in a neuropsychological test (Trail Making Test Part A) than the bipolar group. When duration of illness was controlled, no significant difference was found between depression groups in terms of rumination. There was a negative relationship between rumination and emotion regulation (cognitive reappraisal subscale), and rumination and psychological resilience in both patient groups, but no significant relationship was found in healthy controls. Limitations: Relatively small sample size: future studies in larger clinical samples would increase knowledge of rumination in both unipolar and bipolar depression. Conclusions: Patients experiencing unipolar or bipolar depressive episodes are potentially distinguishable in terms of ruminative response levels and cognitive functions. This differentiation may help in developing targeted interventions for unipolar and bipolar depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据