4.6 Review

Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
卷 77, 期 4, 页码 2102-2113

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14743

关键词

evidence synthesis; methodology; midwifery; nursing; PRISMA‐ ScR; reporting; scoping review

类别

资金

  1. Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Synthesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scoping reviews are a common form of evidence synthesis that provide useful guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians in the field of nursing and midwifery. Critics have raised concerns about the rigor, transparency, and appropriateness of this methodology, but this discussion paper uniquely discusses each component of a scoping review specifically tailored to nursing and midwifery disciplines.
Aim The aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best-practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research. Design Discussion Paper. Data Sources Scoping reviews that exemplify best practice are explored with reference to the recently updated JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR). Implications for nursing and midwifery Scoping reviews are an increasingly common form of evidence synthesis. They are used to address broad research questions and to map evidence from a variety of sources. Scoping reviews are a useful form of evidence synthesis for those in nursing and midwifery and present opportunities for researchers to review a broad array of evidence and resources. However, scoping reviews still need to be conducted with rigour and transparency. Conclusion This study provides guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians who are preparing to undertake an evidence synthesis and are considering a scoping review methodology in the field of nursing and midwifery. Impact With the increasing popularity of scoping reviews, criticism of the rigour, transparency, and appropriateness of the methodology have been raised across multiple academic and clinical disciplines, including nursing and midwifery. This discussion paper provides a unique contribution by discussing each component of a scoping review, including: developing research questions and objectives; protocol development; developing eligibility criteria and the planned search approach; searching and selecting the evidence; extracting and analysing evidence; presenting results; and summarizing the evidence specifically for the fields of nursing and midwifery. Considerations for when to select this methodology and how to prepare a review for publication are also discussed. This approach is applied to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery to assist nursing and/or midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据