4.5 Article

Effect of smelting temperature and CO2 gas flow rate on decarburization kinetics between CO2 gas and liquid Fe-C alloy

期刊

IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 852-859

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03019233.2021.1874623

关键词

Steelmaking process; COMB; CO2 decarburization kinetics; Liquid Fe-C alloy; Smelting temperature; Flow rate; Rate controlling step; Reaction surface area

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51674021, 52004023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the effects of smelting temperature and CO2 flow rate on the decarburization kinetics between CO2 and liquid Fe-C alloy. Results showed that at high carbon content, temperature had a significant impact on the decarburization rate, which increased linearly with CO2 flow rate. The establishment of a CO2 decarburization kinetics model considered various factors influencing the process, with good agreement between calculated and experimental data when the rate controlling step was identified.
The effect of smelting temperature and CO2 flow rate to decarburization kinetics between CO2 and liquid Fe-C alloy were investigated. The decarburization rate caused by CO2 increases with smelting temperature. Compared with low carbon condition (near 0.45 wt pct), the effect of temperature on decarburization rate is more significant under high carbon condition (near 3.5 wt pct). At high carbon content, the decarburization rate increases linearly with CO2 flow rate. And a CO2 decarburization kinetics model considering the influence of bubble diameter, bubble generation frequency, rising velocity and rate controlling step was established. When CO2 transfer in gas phase boundary layer is rate controlling step, the calculated data are in good agreement with the experimental data. It was also found that the effect of CO2 flow rate on the decarburization rate was mainly affected by the reaction surface area, but less on gas phase mass transfer coefficient in current experimental situations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据