4.2 Article

Oral health literacy among third-level university students in cork city; Ireland

期刊

IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 191, 期 1, 页码 461-467

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02505-6

关键词

Health literacy; Ireland; Oral health literacy; Oral health promotion; Public health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Approximately one in four third-level university students in Cork City have adequate oral health literacy. Oral health literacy is significantly correlated with age, major discipline, and frequency of dental visits, with male gender, younger age group, and students in non-medical schools having significantly higher inadequate oral health literacy.
Introduction Health literacy is considered a social determinant of population health, but also relates to making informed health decisions. Little information is available on the oral health literacy (OHL) among young adults, and this is crucial to inform targeted interventions on oral health and care. Aims This study (i) estimates the prevalence of OHL among the third-level university students in Cork City and (ii) identifies determinants of OHL by exploring potential correlates. Methods All students in University College Cork (similar to 21000) were sent out a previously validated questionnaire through the online Lime Survey in April 2018 (n = 1487). Both descriptive and inferential statistics (chi-squared/correlation) were undertaken. OHL score was calculated as adequate (2.1-3.0), marginal (1.1-2.0) or inadequate (0.0-1.0) in regard to the scores attained by the individuals. Results Adequate OHL prevalence was 23%. OHL was significantly correlated with age (r = 0.10), major discipline (r = - 0.13) and frequency of dental visits (r = - 0.08). Male gender, younger age group and those in non-medical schools had significantly higher inadequate OHL. Conclusion Approximately, one-in-four third-level university students in Cork City have adequate OHL which is lower compared to the general Irish population but still significantly high in specific groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据